PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BND.TO vs. FALN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BND.TO vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BND.TO is traded in CAD, while FALN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FALN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND.TO achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than FALN's 5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BND.TO has underperformed FALN with an annualized return of 3.04%, while FALN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.65% annualized return.


BND.TO

1D
0.22%
1M
1.11%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.75%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
3.04%

FALN

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.88%
YTD
5.70%
6M
5.48%
1Y
11.17%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
7.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND.TO vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond Fund
1.55%7.26%7.49%8.45%-7.80%2.62%6.14%4.16%-0.91%1.72%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
5.70%3.95%16.80%10.77%-8.33%5.35%12.13%12.58%3.02%1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BND.TO and FALN is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016

0.14

The correlation between BND.TO and FALN shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BND.TO vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BND.TO
BND.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BND.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BND.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FALN
FALN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND.TO vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BND.TOFALNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.48

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

7.02

+1.57

BND.TO vs. FALN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FALN Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND.TO and FALN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BND.TO vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.55%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND.TO and FALN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BND.TOFALNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.55%

-22.75%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-4.53%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.46%

-8.69%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.43%

-18.04%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.55%

-22.75%

+6.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.11%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-3.27%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

1.59%

-0.89%

Volatility

BND.TO vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) is 1.22%, while iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a volatility of 1.60%. This indicates that BND.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BND.TOFALNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.60%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

4.79%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

6.30%

-3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

9.69%

-4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.15%

10.64%

-5.49%

Dividends

BND.TO vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

BND.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, less than FALN's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond Fund
5.82%5.70%5.24%5.20%4.14%3.67%3.48%3.11%3.96%3.47%3.26%0.53%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
6.42%6.31%6.24%5.37%5.08%3.40%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.98%3.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BND.TO and FALN have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BND.TO is categorized as Global Bonds, while FALN is High Yield Bonds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BND.TO and FALN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer