BND.TO vs. SCHI
BND.TO (Purpose Global Bond Fund) and SCHI (Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BND.TO is a Global Bonds fund, while SCHI is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. BND.TO is actively managed, while SCHI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BND.TO returned 3.28%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for SCHI. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BND.TO vs. SCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BND.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BND.TO achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than SCHI's 3.77% return.
BND.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
SCHI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BND.TO vs. SCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND.TO Purpose Global Bond Fund | 1.55% | 7.26% | 7.49% | 8.45% | -7.80% | 2.62% | 6.14% | 0.76% |
SCHI Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 3.77% | 4.47% | 12.07% | 6.37% | -8.61% | -1.90% | 7.14% | -1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BND.TO and SCHI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019 | 0.16 |
The correlation between BND.TO and SCHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BND.TO vs. SCHI — Risk / Return Rank
BND.TO
SCHI
BND.TO vs. SCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BND.TO | SCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.97 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.59 | 4.33 | +4.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BND.TO vs. SCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BND.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.55%, smaller than the maximum SCHI drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND.TO and SCHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BND.TO | SCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.55% | -18.81% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -4.33% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.46% | -6.00% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.43% | -15.87% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -6.23% | +4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 1.97% | -1.27% |
Volatility
BND.TO vs. SCHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) is 1.22%, while Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that BND.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BND.TO | SCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 1.68% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 4.34% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14% | 6.15% | -3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 9.10% | -4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 9.58% | -4.43% |
Dividends
BND.TO vs. SCHI - Dividend Comparison
BND.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than SCHI's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND.TO Purpose Global Bond Fund | 5.82% | 5.70% | 5.24% | 5.20% | 4.14% | 3.67% | 3.48% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.47% | 3.26% | 0.53% |
SCHI Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 5.04% | 4.99% | 5.11% | 4.27% | 3.10% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BND.TO and SCHI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BND.TO is categorized as Global Bonds, while SCHI is Corporate Bonds.
Find the right allocation for BND.TO and SCHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer