CSPF vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CSPF (Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - CSPF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. CSPF is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, CSPF returned 9.32% vs 80.94% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. CSPF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

CSPF vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSPF achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return.

CSPF

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 2.86%
• 6M: 3.11%
• 1Y: 9.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -12.35%
• YTD: 75.49%
• 6M: 64.35%
• 1Y: 80.94%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 25.10%
• 10Y*: 14.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSPF vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF	2.86%	8.03%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	75.49%	-2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CSPF and UGA is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	-0.08

The correlation between CSPF and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CSPF vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSPF

CSPF Risk / Return Rank: 70
CSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 73

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 69
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSPF vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSPF	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.32	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	2.75	+0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.37	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	5.47	-2.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.18	13.25	+0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSPF vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSPF Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSPF and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSPF	UGA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.32	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	0.12	+1.89

Drawdowns

CSPF vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSPF drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSPF and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSPF	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-86.59%	+83.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-14.88%	+11.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-12.35%	+12.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-36.76%	+36.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	6.13%	-5.46%

Volatility

CSPF vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF) is 1.06%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that CSPF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSPF	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	11.66%	-10.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.02%	30.41%	-27.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.06%	35.14%	-31.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.17%	34.38%	-30.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.17%	37.27%	-33.10%

CSPF vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSPF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSPF vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

CSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF	5.15%	4.63%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSPF and UGA in my portfolio?

CSPF and UGA have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSPF or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to CSPF (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSPF dropped -3.06% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, CSPF or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 80.94% vs 9.32% for CSPF. On fees, CSPF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CSPF has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSPF or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 80.94% return vs 9.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSPF or UGA?

CSPF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSPF or UGA?

CSPF has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between CSPF and UGA?

CSPF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CSPF and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.