PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSLLY vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSLLY vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CSL Ltd (CSLLY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSLLY achieves a -39.03% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CSLLY has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -0.79%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.23% annualized return.


CSLLY

1D
2.95%
1M
-24.68%
YTD
-39.03%
6M
-42.21%
1Y
-55.06%
3Y*
-29.25%
5Y*
-19.84%
10Y*
-0.79%

VOO

1D
-2.59%
1M
0.50%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSLLY vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSLLY
CSL Ltd
-39.03%-32.89%-8.71%0.93%-6.75%-2.97%14.39%51.91%18.57%55.06%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CSLLY and VOO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.45

The correlation between CSLLY and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CSL Ltd

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Return for Risk

CSLLY vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSLLY
CSLLY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CSLLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSLLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSLLY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CSLLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSLLY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSLLY vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSL Ltd (CSLLY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSLLYVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.68

1.39

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

2.92

-3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.65

13.53

-15.18

CSLLY vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSLLY Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSLLY and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSLLYVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.41

2.15

-3.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.72

0.80

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.85

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.88

-0.61

Drawdowns

CSLLY vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSLLY drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSLLY and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSLLYVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.57%

-33.99%

-35.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.86%

-8.90%

-52.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.37%

-18.69%

-48.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.57%

-24.52%

-45.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.57%

-33.99%

-35.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.14%

-2.90%

-65.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.44%

-3.69%

-7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.38%

1.92%

+31.46%

Volatility

CSLLY vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

CSL Ltd (CSLLY) has a higher volatility of 19.48% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.74%. This indicates that CSLLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSLLYVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.48%

3.74%

+15.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.96%

9.30%

+18.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.06%

12.10%

+26.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.51%

16.84%

+10.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.57%

18.02%

+11.55%

Dividends

CSLLY vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CSLLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSLLY
CSL Ltd
6.16%2.53%1.45%1.21%1.14%1.05%0.89%0.85%1.18%1.72%3.45%1.46%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSLLY and VOO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSLLY has higher volatility (19.48%) compared to VOO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSLLY dropped -69.57% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSLLY and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer