CSLLY vs. MU

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CSLLY (CSL Ltd) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. CSLLY operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CSLLY returned -0.79%/yr vs 52.53%/yr for MU. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CSLLY vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CSL Ltd (CSLLY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSLLY achieves a -39.03% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 202.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CSLLY has underperformed MU with an annualized return of -0.79%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 52.53% annualized return.

CSLLY

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -24.68%
• YTD: -39.03%
• 6M: -42.21%
• 1Y: -55.06%
• 3Y*: -29.25%
• 5Y*: -19.84%
• 10Y*: -0.79%

MU

• 1D: -13.25%
• 1M: 29.62%
• YTD: 202.85%
• 6M: 264.52%
• 1Y: 714.83%
• 3Y*: 134.88%
• 5Y*: 60.28%
• 10Y*: 52.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSLLY vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSLLY CSL Ltd	-39.03%	-32.89%	-8.71%	0.93%	-6.75%	-2.97%	14.39%	51.91%	18.57%	55.06%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	202.85%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-22.84%	87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CSLLY and MU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008	0.29

The correlation between CSLLY and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap CSLLY : $16.64B MU : $984.97B
EPS CSLLY : $4.30 MU : $21.26
PE Ratio CSLLY : 3.98 MU : 40.65
PEG Ratio CSLLY : 0.56 MU : 0.15
PS Ratio CSLLY : 0.55 MU : 16.86
PB Ratio CSLLY : 0.89 MU : 13.59
Total Revenue (TTM) CSLLY : $30.52B MU : $58.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) CSLLY : $15.22B MU : $33.96B
EBITDA (TTM) CSLLY : $9.90B MU : $25.99B

Return for Risk

CSLLY vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSLLY

CSLLY Risk / Return Rank: 3
CSLLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CSLLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CSLLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CSLLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CSLLY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSLLY vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSL Ltd (CSLLY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSLLY	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.41	10.62	-12.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.03	6.07	-8.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.68	1.79	-1.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	23.84	-24.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.65	92.82	-94.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSLLY vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSLLY Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 10.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSLLY and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSLLY	MU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.41	10.62	-12.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.72	1.15	-1.87
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.03	1.06	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.30	-0.03

Drawdowns

CSLLY vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSLLY drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSLLY and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSLLY	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.57%	-98.25%	+28.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.86%	-30.28%	-31.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.37%	-57.63%	-9.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.57%	-57.63%	-11.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.57%	-57.63%	-11.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.14%	-19.97%	-48.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.44%	-58.19%	+46.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.38%	7.76%	+25.62%

Volatility

CSLLY vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSL Ltd (CSLLY) is 19.48%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.52%. This indicates that CSLLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSLLY	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.48%	33.52%	-14.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.96%	56.29%	-28.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.06%	68.01%	-28.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.51%	52.75%	-25.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.57%	49.89%	-20.32%

Dividends

CSLLY vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

CSLLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than MU's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSLLY CSL Ltd	6.16%	2.53%	1.45%	1.21%	1.14%	1.05%	0.89%	0.85%	1.18%	1.72%	3.45%	1.46%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.06%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

CSLLY vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CSL Ltd and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CSLLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSL Ltd reported a gross profit of 4.21B and revenue of 8.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.7%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

CSLLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSL Ltd reported an operating income of 2.60B and revenue of 8.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

CSLLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSL Ltd reported a net income of 401.70M and revenue of 8.30B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSLLY and MU in my portfolio?

CSLLY and MU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSLLY or MU?

MU has higher volatility (33.52%) compared to CSLLY (19.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSLLY dropped -69.57% vs MU's -98.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.62 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.