CSLLY vs. MU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CSL Ltd (CSLLY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU).

Performance

CSLLY vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CSL Ltd (CSLLY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSLLY vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSLLY CSL Ltd	-12.57%	-32.89%	-8.71%	0.93%	-6.75%	-2.97%	14.39%	51.91%	18.57%	55.06%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	18.42%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-22.84%	87.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CSLLY : $23.87B MU : $385.14B
EPS CSLLY : $4.30 MU : $21.30
PE Ratio CSLLY : 5.71 MU : 15.86
PEG Ratio CSLLY : 0.81 MU : 0.06
PS Ratio CSLLY : 0.78 MU : 6.58
PB Ratio CSLLY : 1.28 MU : 5.32
Total Revenue (TTM) CSLLY : $30.52B MU : $58.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) CSLLY : $15.22B MU : $33.96B
EBITDA (TTM) CSLLY : $9.90B MU : $25.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSLLY achieves a -12.57% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 18.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CSLLY has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 4.12%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 41.16% annualized return.

CSLLY

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: -3.36%
• YTD: -12.57%
• 6M: -23.11%
• 1Y: -35.55%
• 3Y*: -18.42%
• 5Y*: -11.83%
• 10Y*: 4.12%

MU

• 1D: 4.98%
• 1M: -18.04%
• YTD: 18.42%
• 6M: 102.21%
• 1Y: 289.74%
• 3Y*: 78.45%
• 5Y*: 30.25%
• 10Y*: 41.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CSLLY vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSLLY

CSLLY Risk / Return Rank: 9
CSLLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CSLLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CSLLY Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CSLLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CSLLY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSLLY vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSL Ltd (CSLLY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSLLY	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	4.49	-5.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.19	3.83	-5.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.52	-0.70
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	9.36	-10.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	31.94	-33.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSLLY vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSLLY Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 4.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSLLY and MU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSLLY	MU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.99	4.49	-5.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	0.61	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	0.85	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.25	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between CSLLY and MU is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CSLLY vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

CSLLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than MU's 0.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSLLY CSL Ltd	4.30%	2.53%	1.45%	1.21%	1.14%	1.05%	0.89%	0.85%	1.18%	1.72%	3.45%	1.46%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.15%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CSLLY vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSLLY drawdown since its inception was -55.41%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSLLY and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSLLY	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.41%	-98.25%	+42.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.11%	-30.28%	-13.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.41%	-57.63%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.41%	-57.63%	+2.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.31%	-26.80%	-27.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.92%	-58.46%	+47.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.31%	8.87%	+16.44%

Volatility

CSLLY vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CSL Ltd (CSLLY) is 8.86%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 23.12%. This indicates that CSLLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSLLY	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.86%	23.12%	-14.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.36%	49.17%	-22.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.15%	65.00%	-28.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.24%	49.86%	-23.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.98%	48.59%	-19.61%

Financials

CSLLY vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CSL Ltd and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CSLLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CSL Ltd reported a gross profit of 4.21B and revenue of 8.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.7%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

CSLLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CSL Ltd reported an operating income of 2.60B and revenue of 8.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

CSLLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CSL Ltd reported a net income of 401.70M and revenue of 8.30B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.