CSIO vs. VT
CSIO (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CSIO is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSIO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
CSIO vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSIO achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.01% return.
CSIO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
CSIO vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 15.51% | 0.82% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.01% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSIO and VT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSIO vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
CSIO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VT
CSIO vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSIO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSIO vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSIO drawdown since its inception was -5.86%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIO and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSIO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -50.27% | +44.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -2.84% | +1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -7.00% | +5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.23% | — |
Volatility
CSIO vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSIO | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.35% | 13.56% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 16.19% | -4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 17.20% | -5.85% |
CSIO vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSIO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSIO vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
CSIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSIO Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSIO and VT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSIO.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.65% for CSIO.
They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSIO and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for CSIO and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer