PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSHI vs. VBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSHI vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than VBIL's 1.50% return.


CSHI

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
2.26%
6M
2.59%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
10Y*

VBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHI vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CSHI and VBIL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSHI vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI
CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHI vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSHIVBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-27.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.75

21.10

-18.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.16

42.61

-13.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

154.18

532.54

-378.36

CSHI vs. VBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHI Sharpe Ratio is 6.16, which is lower than the VBIL Sharpe Ratio of 15.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHI and VBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSHIVBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.16

15.17

-9.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.18

13.44

-9.26

Drawdowns

CSHI vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, which is greater than VBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and VBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSHIVBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-0.09%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-0.09%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-0.00%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.01%

+0.02%

Volatility

CSHI vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison

Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) has a higher volatility of 0.11% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that CSHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSHIVBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.11%

0.06%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

0.16%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86%

0.26%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.32%

0.30%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.32%

0.30%

+1.02%

CSHI vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSHI vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison

CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than VBIL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CSHI
Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF
4.90%5.11%5.72%6.15%1.52%
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.65%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSHI and VBIL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSHI has higher volatility (0.11%) compared to VBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHI dropped -1.69% vs VBIL's -0.09%.

On 1-year performance, CSHI leads with 5.25% vs 3.93% for VBIL. On fees, VBIL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CSHI has performed better with a 5.25% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBIL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.

CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 3.65% for VBIL.

CSHI tracks NONE, while VBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CSHI and 0.07% for VBIL.

VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.17 vs 6.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSHI and VBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer