CSHI vs. RPHIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) and RPHIX (RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund) are both funds - CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the NONE, while RPHIX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by RiverPark Funds. Over the past 3 years, CSHI returned 5.45%/yr vs 5.65%/yr for RPHIX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RPHIX.

Performance

CSHI vs. RPHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than RPHIX's 1.76% return.

CSHI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RPHIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 1.76%
• 6M: 2.31%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 5.65%
• 5Y*: 4.63%
• 10Y*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHI vs. RPHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	2.26%	5.05%	5.66%	6.21%	1.46%
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund	1.76%	4.76%	6.71%	5.87%	1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CSHI and RPHIX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022	0.09

Return for Risk

CSHI vs. RPHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

RPHIX

RPHIX Risk / Return Rank: 100
RPHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
RPHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
RPHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
RPHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
RPHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHI vs. RPHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSHI	RPHIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.16	5.17	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	11.83	10.99	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.75	3.74	-0.99
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	29.16	43.68	-14.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	154.18	122.56	+31.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSHI vs. RPHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHI Sharpe Ratio is 6.16, which is comparable to the RPHIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHI and RPHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSHI	RPHIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.16	5.17	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	3.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	2.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.18	2.96	+1.23

Drawdowns

CSHI vs. RPHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum RPHIX drawdown of -3.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and RPHIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSHI	RPHIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-3.16%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.18%	-0.10%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.69%	-0.72%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-3.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.09%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.04%	-0.01%

Volatility

CSHI vs. RPHIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) is 0.11%, while RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) has a volatility of 0.24%. This indicates that CSHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSHI	RPHIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	0.24%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.52%	0.59%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86%	0.88%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.32%	1.26%	+0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.32%	1.20%	+0.12%

CSHI vs. RPHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RPHIX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSHI vs. RPHIX - Dividend Comparison

CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than RPHIX's 4.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.90%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund	4.08%	4.76%	6.40%	5.08%	3.46%	2.03%	2.44%	2.85%	2.83%	2.68%	2.63%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSHI and RPHIX in my portfolio?

CSHI and RPHIX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSHI or RPHIX?

RPHIX has higher volatility (0.24%) compared to CSHI (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHI dropped -1.69% vs RPHIX's -3.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.16 vs 5.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.