PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPHIX vs. LSCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPHIX vs. LSCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPHIX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than LSCIX's 0.67% return.


RPHIX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.76%
6M
2.31%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
3.54%

LSCIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPHIX vs. LSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPHIX
RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund
1.76%4.76%6.71%5.87%2.97%2.05%1.95%2.77%2.44%1.53%
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
0.67%5.73%4.84%4.78%-4.20%0.17%2.76%4.99%1.62%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RPHIX and LSCIX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2017

0.04

The correlation between RPHIX and LSCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (3 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPHIX vs. LSCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPHIX
RPHIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
RPHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
RPHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

LSCIX
LSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPHIX vs. LSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPHIXLSCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.27

1.95

+3.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

11.25

3.76

+7.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.81

1.49

+2.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

44.16

3.25

+40.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

124.15

12.52

+111.63

RPHIX vs. LSCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPHIX Sharpe Ratio is 5.27, which is higher than the LSCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPHIX and LSCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPHIXLSCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.27

1.95

+3.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.68

1.00

+2.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.96

1.10

+1.86

Drawdowns

RPHIX vs. LSCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPHIX drawdown since its inception was -3.16%, smaller than the maximum LSCIX drawdown of -7.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPHIX and LSCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPHIXLSCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-7.31%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-1.40%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.72%

-1.40%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.92%

-6.51%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-0.96%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.36%

-0.32%

Volatility

RPHIX vs. LSCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) is 0.24%, while Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund (LSCIX) has a volatility of 0.69%. This indicates that RPHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPHIXLSCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

0.69%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

1.58%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88%

2.08%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.26%

2.27%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.20%

2.11%

-0.91%

RPHIX vs. LSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPHIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LSCIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPHIX vs. LSCIX - Dividend Comparison

RPHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than LSCIX's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSCIX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Core Bond Fund
4.63%4.68%4.61%4.08%2.32%1.92%2.49%3.22%3.35%1.16%0.00%0.00%
RPHIX
RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund
4.08%4.76%6.40%5.08%3.46%2.03%2.44%2.85%2.83%2.68%2.63%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPHIX and LSCIX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSCIX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to RPHIX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPHIX dropped -3.16% vs LSCIX's -7.31%.

RPHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.27 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPHIX and LSCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer