CSHI vs. MLPI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI).

CSHI and MLPI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022. MLPI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Dec 17, 2025.

Performance

CSHI vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSHI vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	1.30%	0.18%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.27%	0.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 17.27% return.

CSHI

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 17.27%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHI vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

MLPI

Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF

CSHI

Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

Return for Risk

CSHI vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 97
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHI vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSHI	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.01	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	28.78	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSHI	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.10	7.48	-3.39

Correlation

The correlation between CSHI and MLPI is -0.17. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

CSHI vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than MLPI's 3.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.98%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	3.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CSHI vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum MLPI drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSHI	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-2.78%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.19%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.60%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSHI	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01%	11.12%	-9.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.35%	11.12%	-9.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.35%	11.12%	-9.77%