CSHI vs. ICSH
CSHI (NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSHI returned 5.40%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.
Performance
CSHI vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly higher than ICSH's 1.55% return.
CSHI
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
CSHI vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.39% | 5.05% | 5.66% | 6.21% | 1.39% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.55% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHI and ICSH is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2022 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSHI vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
CSHI
ICSH
CSHI vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSHI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.59 | 5.60 | -3.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 24.19 | 42.20 | -18.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 129.69 | 238.45 | -108.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSHI vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum ICSH drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -3.94% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.21% | -0.10% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.69% | -0.10% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.05% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.08% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.02% | +0.02% |
Volatility
CSHI vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) has a higher volatility of 0.33% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.16%. This indicates that CSHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSHI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 0.16% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.60% | 0.32% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90% | 0.41% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 0.49% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 1.06% | +0.27% |
CSHI vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSHI vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than ICSH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 5.31% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSHI and ICSH have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSHI has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to ICSH (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHI dropped -1.69% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
On 3-year performance, CSHI leads with 5.40% vs 5.11% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CSHI has performed better with a 5.40% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.
CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 4.34% for ICSH.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CSHI and 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.20 vs 5.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSHI and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer