CSHI vs. ICSH
Compare and contrast key facts about Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH).
CSHI and ICSH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022. ICSH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index (USD). It was launched on Dec 11, 2013. Both CSHI and ICSH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CSHI vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSHI vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 1.30% | 5.05% | 5.66% | 6.21% | 1.46% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 0.74% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 1.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than ICSH's 0.74% return.
CSHI
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSHI vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSHI vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
CSHI
ICSH
CSHI vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSHI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 10.86 | -8.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.01 | 25.58 | -21.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.01 | 6.41 | -4.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 45.33 | -42.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.78 | 283.87 | -255.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSHI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 10.86 | -8.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 7.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.10 | 1.90 | +2.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHI and ICSH is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CSHI vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than ICSH's 4.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 4.98% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.46% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
Drawdowns
CSHI vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum ICSH drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and ICSH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -3.94% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.69% | -0.10% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.08% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 0.02% | +0.17% |
Volatility
CSHI vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.16%. This indicates that CSHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSHI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 0.16% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.68% | 0.26% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01% | 0.41% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 0.48% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.35% | 1.06% | +0.29% |