CSHI vs. IAUM
CSHI (NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) and IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) are both exchange-traded funds - CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Neos, while IAUM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. CSHI is actively managed, while IAUM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CSHI returned 5.42%/yr vs 29.28%/yr for IAUM. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IAUM.
Performance
CSHI vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than IAUM's -2.40% return.
CSHI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -9.51%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHI vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.31% | 5.05% | 5.66% | 6.21% | 1.39% |
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | -2.40% | 64.27% | 27.04% | 13.12% | 4.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSHI and IAUM is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2022 | 0.04 |
CSHI vs. IAUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSHI
IAUM
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
CSHI
IAUM
-
Financial Services
CSHI
IAUM
-
Communication Services
CSHI
IAUM
-
Consumer Cyclical
CSHI
IAUM
-
Healthcare
CSHI
IAUM
-
Industrials
CSHI
IAUM
-
Consumer Defensive
CSHI
IAUM
-
Energy
CSHI
IAUM
-
Utilities
CSHI
IAUM
-
Real Estate
CSHI
IAUM
Basic Materials
CSHI
IAUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSHI vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank
CSHI
IAUM
CSHI vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSHI | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.60 | 1.19 | +1.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 24.49 | 1.00 | +23.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 131.09 | 2.87 | +128.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSHI vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum IAUM drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and IAUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSHI | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -24.37% | +22.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.21% | -24.37% | +24.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.69% | -24.37% | +22.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.99% | +21.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -5.38% | +5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 8.46% | -8.42% |
Volatility
CSHI vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) is 0.33%, while iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that CSHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSHI | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 7.71% | -7.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.60% | 23.82% | -23.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91% | 27.06% | -26.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 18.05% | -16.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.33% | 18.05% | -16.72% |
CSHI vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSHI vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison
CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, while IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 5.31% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% |
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSHI and IAUM have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAUM has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to CSHI (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHI dropped -1.69% vs IAUM's -24.37%.
On 3-year performance, IAUM leads with 29.28% vs 5.42% for CSHI. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CSHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 29.28% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.
CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.
CSHI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IAUM is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CSHI and 0.09% for IAUM.
CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.77 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSHI and IAUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer