CSHI vs. CLOX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX).

CSHI and CLOX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022. CLOX is an actively managed fund by Panagram. It was launched on Jul 18, 2023.

Performance

CSHI vs. CLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSHI vs. CLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	1.30%	5.05%	5.66%	2.64%
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	1.01%	5.52%	7.16%	3.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than CLOX's 1.01% return.

CSHI

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 2.48%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHI vs. CLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOX's 0.20% expense ratio.

CSHI

Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

CLOX

Panagram AAA CLO ETF

Return for Risk

CSHI vs. CLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 97
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 98

CLOX

CLOX Risk / Return Rank: 72
CLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHI vs. CLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSHI	CLOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	1.04	+1.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	1.30	+2.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.01	1.51	+0.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	1.36	+1.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	28.78	15.61	+13.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSHI vs. CLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the CLOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHI and CLOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSHI	CLOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	1.04	+1.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.10	1.93	+2.17

Correlation

The correlation between CSHI and CLOX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CSHI vs. CLOX - Dividend Comparison

CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, which matches CLOX's 5.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.98%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	5.00%	5.18%	6.25%	2.90%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CSHI vs. CLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum CLOX drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and CLOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSHI	CLOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-4.13%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.69%	-4.02%	+2.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.09%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.19%	0.35%	-0.16%

Volatility

CSHI vs. CLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) is 0.39%, while Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that CSHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSHI	CLOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	0.63%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.68%	0.90%	-0.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01%	5.22%	-3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.35%	3.42%	-2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.35%	3.42%	-2.07%