CLOX vs. CLOA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CLOX (Panagram AAA CLO ETF) and CLOA (iShares AAA CLO Active ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CLOX returned 5.34% vs 5.23% for CLOA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

CLOX vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CLOX having a 2.31% return and CLOA slightly lower at 2.27%.

CLOX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOA

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 2.27%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 5.23%
• 3Y*: 6.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOX vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	2.31%	5.52%	7.16%	3.85%
CLOA iShares AAA CLO Active ETF	2.27%	5.44%	7.25%	3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOX and CLOA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2023	0.15

Return for Risk

CLOX vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOX

CLOX Risk / Return Rank: 97
CLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CLOA

CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 99
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOX vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOX	CLOA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.15	7.58	-3.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.99	14.27	-7.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.02	3.43	-1.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.15	29.72	-21.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	42.62	151.56	-108.94

CLOX vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOX Sharpe Ratio is 4.15, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 7.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOX and CLOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOX vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOX drawdown since its inception was -4.13%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOX and CLOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOX	CLOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-1.34%	-2.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.66%	-0.18%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-0.05%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	0.03%	+0.10%

Volatility

CLOX vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA) at 0.15%. This indicates that CLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOX	CLOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	0.15%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.94%	0.49%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30%	0.69%	+0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	1.31%	+1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.30%	1.31%	+1.99%

CLOX vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLOX and CLOA have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CLOX vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

CLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, which matches CLOA's 4.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLOA iShares AAA CLO Active ETF	4.95%	5.35%	6.01%	5.88%
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	4.97%	5.18%	6.25%	2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOX and CLOA in my portfolio?

CLOX and CLOA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOX or CLOA?

CLOX has higher volatility (0.39%) compared to CLOA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOX dropped -4.13% vs CLOA's -1.34%.

Which ETF is better, CLOX or CLOA?

On 1-year performance, CLOX leads with 5.34% vs 5.23% for CLOA. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, CLOA has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOX or CLOA?

Over the 1-year period, CLOX has performed better with a 5.34% return vs 5.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOX or CLOA?

CLOX and CLOA have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOX or CLOA?

CLOX has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 4.95% for CLOA.

What is the main difference between CLOX and CLOA?

They also come from different issuers: Panagram and BlackRock.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.58 vs 4.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.