CSEX vs. CIFG
CSEX (Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSEX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
CSEX vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSEX achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 104.47% return.
CSEX
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- 47.97%
- YTD
- 104.47%
- 6M
- 64.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSEX vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSEX Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF | 16.76% | -30.62% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 104.47% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSEX and CIFG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSEX vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLS Daily ETF (CSEX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSEX vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSEX drawdown since its inception was -56.45%, smaller than the maximum CIFG drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEX and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSEX | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.45% | -71.71% | +15.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.34% | -6.83% | -32.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -35.73% | +7.51% |
Volatility
CSEX vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSEX | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.45% | 206.60% | -50.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 156.45% | 206.60% | -50.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 156.45% | 206.60% | -50.15% |
CSEX vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSEX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSEX vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSEX nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSEX and CIFG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CSEX.
CSEX and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CSEX and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for CSEX and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer