CSEN vs. CSSD
CSEN (Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF) and CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSEN is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSSD is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. CSEN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CSSD.
Performance
CSEN vs. CSSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CSEN
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSSD
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSEN vs. CSSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF | -0.75% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSEN and CSSD is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSEN vs. CSSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) and Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSEN vs. CSSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSEN drawdown since its inception was -5.10%, which is greater than CSSD's maximum drawdown of -2.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEN and CSSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSEN | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -2.32% | -2.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.26% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -0.28% | -2.48% |
Volatility
CSEN vs. CSSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSEN | CSSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 3.02% | +12.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 3.02% | +12.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 3.02% | +12.50% |
CSEN vs. CSSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSEN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSEN vs. CSSD - Dividend Comparison
CSEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than CSSD's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF | 0.33% | 0.00% |
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF | 3.15% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSEN and CSSD have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CSEN.
CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.33% for CSEN.
CSEN is categorized as Energy Equities, while CSSD is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CSEN and 0.49% for CSSD.
Find the right allocation for CSEN and CSSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer