CSEN vs. CSSD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CSEN (Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF) and CSSD (Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSEN is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while CSSD is a Preferred Stock fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. Their -0.13 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CSEN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CSSD.

Performance

CSEN vs. CSSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) and Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CSEN

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 5.61%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CSSD

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: 2.03%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	$463.01K	$572.30K	$765.26K
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	$130.43K	$632.60K	$285.67K

CSEN vs. CSSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	0.47%
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CSEN and CSSD is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026	-0.13

Return for Risk

CSEN vs. CSSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF (CSEN) and Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF (CSSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CSEN vs. CSSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSEN drawdown since its inception was -5.10%, which is greater than CSSD's maximum drawdown of -2.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSEN and CSSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSEN	CSSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-2.32%	-2.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-0.07%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-0.28%	-1.92%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CSEN	CSSD	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.99%	2.96%	+14.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.99%	2.96%	+14.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	2.96%	+14.03%

CSEN vs. CSSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSEN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSD's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSEN vs. CSSD - Dividend Comparison

CSEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than CSSD's 3.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CSEN Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Active ETF	0.32%	0.00%
CSSD Cohen & Steers Short Duration Preferred and Income Active ETF	3.63%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSEN and CSSD in my portfolio?

CSEN and CSSD have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CSEN or CSSD?

On fees, CSSD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSEN or CSSD?

CSSD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CSEN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSEN or CSSD?

CSSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.32% for CSEN.

What is the main difference between CSEN and CSSD?

CSEN is categorized as Energy Equities, while CSSD is Preferred Stock. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CSEN and 0.49% for CSSD.