PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSD vs. LSAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSD vs. LSAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 40.17% return, which is significantly higher than LSAF's 13.16% return.


CSD

1D
0.36%
1M
5.52%
YTD
40.17%
6M
38.88%
1Y
73.14%
3Y*
37.02%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
14.06%

LSAF

1D
0.59%
1M
3.77%
YTD
13.16%
6M
13.93%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSD vs. LSAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
40.17%21.58%27.61%23.77%-15.04%13.01%10.79%20.61%-21.47%
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
13.16%12.01%18.09%15.48%-13.12%22.75%6.92%28.35%-15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CSD and LSAF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.84

The correlation between CSD and LSAF shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSD vs. LSAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSD
LSAF

Industrials

31.1%
15.4%

Technology

18.6%
16.4%

Healthcare

13.1%
9.3%

Basic Materials

11.1%
3.1%

Communication Services

9.0%
1.0%

Utilities

7.0%
0.9%

Real Estate

5.1%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
22.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.3%

Energy

-

5.6%

Industrials

CSD
31.1%
LSAF
15.4%

Technology

CSD
18.6%
LSAF
16.4%

Healthcare

CSD
13.1%
LSAF
9.3%

Basic Materials

CSD
11.1%
LSAF
3.1%

Communication Services

CSD
9.0%
LSAF
1.0%

Utilities

CSD
7.0%
LSAF
0.9%

Real Estate

CSD
5.1%
LSAF
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CSD
2.9%
LSAF
22.5%

Financial Services

CSD
0.1%
LSAF
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

CSD

-

LSAF
7.3%

Energy

CSD

-

LSAF
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSD vs. LSAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSD
CSD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

LSAF
LSAF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LSAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSAF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LSAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSAF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSD vs. LSAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSDLSAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.30

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.48

3.81

+2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.42

12.46

+12.96

CSD vs. LSAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the LSAF Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSD and LSAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSDLSAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

1.74

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.54

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.48

-0.04

Drawdowns

CSD vs. LSAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than LSAF's maximum drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and LSAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSDLSAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.47%

-41.67%

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-6.58%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.15%

-20.26%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.15%

-24.94%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.23%

-6.32%

-7.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.01%

+0.88%

Volatility

CSD vs. LSAF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) at 3.69%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSDLSAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

3.69%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.29%

10.28%

+8.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.82%

14.40%

+9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.26%

18.39%

+4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.83%

21.87%

+2.96%

CSD vs. LSAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSD vs. LSAF - Dividend Comparison

CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than LSAF's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
0.11%0.16%0.17%0.51%0.86%0.73%0.99%1.08%0.99%0.60%1.62%2.61%
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
0.61%0.69%0.42%0.84%0.96%0.37%0.53%0.71%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSD and LSAF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSD has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to LSAF (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs LSAF's -41.67%.

On 5-year performance, CSD leads with 16.53% vs 9.96% for LSAF. On fees, CSD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LSAF has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CSD has performed better with a 16.53% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LSAF.

LSAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.

CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while LSAF tracks AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.75% for LSAF.

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSD and LSAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer