CSCS vs. MSFD
CSCS (Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares) and MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSCS charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MSFD.
Performance
CSCS vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCS achieves a -43.85% return, which is significantly lower than MSFD's 10.13% return.
CSCS
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -29.36%
- YTD
- -43.85%
- 6M
- -43.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFD
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- -7.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSCS vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | -43.85% | -11.22% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 10.13% | 3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCS and MSFD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCS vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank
CSCS
MSFD
CSCS vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares (CSCS) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSCS | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.71 | -0.51 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
CSCS vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCS drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum MSFD drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCS and MSFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCS | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -59.90% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.58% | -50.33% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -41.60% | +27.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.40% | — |
Volatility
CSCS vs. MSFD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCS | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.66% | 25.32% | +5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 26.14% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 26.14% | +4.52% |
CSCS vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFD's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCS vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison
CSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than MSFD's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCS Direxion Daily CSCO Bear 1X Shares | 4.13% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 2.84% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCS and MSFD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSCS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSCS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.
CSCS has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 2.84% for MSFD.
Their fees differ too: 1.00% for CSCS and 1.06% for MSFD.
Find the right allocation for CSCS and MSFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer