CSCO vs. USB
CSCO (Cisco Systems, Inc.) and USB (U.S. Bancorp) are both stocks. CSCO operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while USB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CSCO returned 18.92%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for USB. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSCO vs. USB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCO achieves a 58.91% return, which is significantly higher than USB's 11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CSCO has outperformed USB with an annualized return of 18.92%, while USB has yielded a comparatively lower 7.51% annualized return.
CSCO
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 58.91%
- 6M
- 57.34%
- 1Y
- 93.30%
- 3Y*
- 37.33%
- 5Y*
- 20.60%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
USB
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 42.92%
- 3Y*
- 27.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
CSCO vs. USB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 58.91% | 33.47% | 21.00% | 9.30% | -22.46% | 45.76% | -3.49% | 13.81% | 16.57% | 31.27% |
USB U.S. Bancorp | 11.60% | 16.48% | 15.62% | 4.79% | -19.13% | 24.32% | -17.85% | 33.62% | -12.36% | 6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCO and USB is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.35 |
The correlation between CSCO and USB shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CSCO:
$482.83B
USB:
$91.65B
CSCO:
$3.00
USB:
$5.02
CSCO:
40.40
USB:
11.75
CSCO:
7.95
USB:
2.12
CSCO:
9.88
USB:
1.55
CSCO:
$60.75B
USB:
$43.34B
CSCO:
$39.08B
USB:
$27.22B
CSCO:
$13.98B
USB:
$10.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCO vs. USB — Risk / Return Rank
CSCO
USB
CSCO vs. USB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and U.S. Bancorp (USB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSCO | USB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.31 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.69 | 2.42 | +4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.37 | 6.02 | +12.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSCO vs. USB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCO drawdown since its inception was -89.26%, which is greater than USB's maximum drawdown of -76.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCO and USB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCO | USB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.26% | -76.08% | -13.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -16.21% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | -30.63% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.68% | -52.13% | +15.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.95% | -52.13% | +10.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -1.88% | -4.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.11% | -15.63% | -24.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 6.53% | -1.60% |
Volatility
CSCO vs. USB - Volatility Comparison
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a higher volatility of 17.31% compared to U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 7.25%. This indicates that CSCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCO | USB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.31% | 7.25% | +10.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.29% | 16.61% | +10.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.93% | 22.27% | +8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 29.82% | -4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 30.31% | -4.42% |
Dividends
CSCO vs. USB - Dividend Comparison
CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than USB's 3.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1.36% | 2.12% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 2.32% | 3.20% | 2.88% | 2.95% | 2.95% | 3.28% | 3.02% |
USB U.S. Bancorp | 3.50% | 3.82% | 4.14% | 4.46% | 4.31% | 3.13% | 3.61% | 2.66% | 2.93% | 2.16% | 2.08% | 2.37% |
Financials
CSCO vs. USB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cisco Systems, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSCO vs. USB - Profitability Comparison
CSCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 15.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.
USB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a gross profit of 6.68B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.
CSCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.
USB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported an operating income of 2.69B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.8%.
CSCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.
USB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, U.S. Bancorp reported a net income of 1.95B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCO and USB have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSCO has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to USB (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCO dropped -89.26% vs USB's -76.08%.
CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSCO and USB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer