CSCL vs. HOOG
CSCL (Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, CSCL returned 168.92% vs -32.07% for HOOG. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CSCL charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.
Performance
CSCL vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCL achieves a 122.84% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -32.04% return.
CSCL
- 1D
- 5.31%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- 140.54%
- YTD
- 122.84%
- 1Y
- 168.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOG
- 1D
- -5.50%
- 1M
- 38.68%
- 6M
- -33.91%
- YTD
- -32.04%
- 1Y
- -32.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSCL vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CSCL Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares | 122.84% | 20.73% |
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -32.04% | 39.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCL and HOOG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCL vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank
CSCL
HOOG
CSCL vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSCL | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.07 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.93 | -0.38 | +6.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.47 | -0.56 | +14.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSCL vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCL drawdown since its inception was -27.41%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCL and HOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCL | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.41% | -86.94% | +59.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.41% | -86.94% | +59.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -68.30% | +53.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -40.20% | +30.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.07% | 58.05% | -45.98% |
Volatility
CSCL vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares (CSCL) is 20.67%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 37.80%. This indicates that CSCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCL | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.67% | 37.80% | -17.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.74% | 104.40% | -46.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.27% | 138.25% | -73.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.26% | 144.40% | -81.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.26% | 144.40% | -81.14% |
CSCL vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSCL has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSCL vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison
CSCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than HOOG's 18.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSCL Direxion Daily CSCO Bull 2X Shares | 1.14% | 1.31% |
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 18.10% | 12.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCL and HOOG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOG has higher volatility (37.80%) compared to CSCL (20.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCL dropped -27.41% vs HOOG's -86.94%.
On 1-year performance, CSCL leads with 168.92% vs -32.07% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CSCL has been the lower-risk option at 20.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSCL has performed better with a 168.92% return vs -32.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for CSCL.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 18.10%, compared with 1.14% for CSCL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for CSCL and 0.75% for HOOG.
CSCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSCL and HOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer