PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSB vs. CDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSB vs. CDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSB having a 17.53% return and CDL slightly higher at 18.31%. Over the past 10 years, CSB has underperformed CDL with an annualized return of 10.16%, while CDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.14% annualized return.


CSB

1D
2.06%
1M
5.76%
6M
11.97%
YTD
17.53%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*
10.16%

CDL

1D
1.78%
1M
3.68%
6M
13.91%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSB vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
17.53%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
18.31%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%16.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and CDL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.79

The correlation between CSB and CDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSB vs. CDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSB
CDL

Financial Services

26.9%
23.1%

Utilities

21.7%
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

19.5%
6.9%

Energy

10.6%
9.0%

Industrials

8.5%
2.2%

Communication Services

4.0%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
15.8%

Basic Materials

3.6%
0.0%

Technology

1.3%
8.0%

Healthcare

0.4%
6.9%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Financial Services

CSB
26.9%
CDL
23.1%

Utilities

CSB
21.7%
CDL
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CSB
19.5%
CDL
6.9%

Energy

CSB
10.6%
CDL
9.0%

Industrials

CSB
8.5%
CDL
2.2%

Communication Services

CSB
4.0%
CDL
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

CSB
4.0%
CDL
15.8%

Basic Materials

CSB
3.6%
CDL
0.0%

Technology

CSB
1.3%
CDL
8.0%

Healthcare

CSB
0.4%
CDL
6.9%

Real Estate

CSB

-

CDL
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSB vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSB vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSBCDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

4.14

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

14.63

-4.68

CSB vs. CDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the CDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and CDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSB vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, roughly equal to the maximum CDL drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and CDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSBCDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-41.03%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-5.66%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-12.87%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-17.28%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-41.03%

-1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-4.31%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

1.60%

+0.86%

Volatility

CSB vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.87%, while VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSBCDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

4.14%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

7.63%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

10.20%

+3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

13.89%

+4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

17.03%

+4.21%

CSB vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CSB and CDL have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

CSB vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, which matches CDL's 3.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.03%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.06%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSB and CDL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDL has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to CSB (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs CDL's -41.03%.

On 10-year performance, CDL leads with 11.14% vs 10.16% for CSB. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CDL has performed better with a 11.14% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB and CDL have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 3.03% for CDL.

CSB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while CDL is Large Cap Value Equities. CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index.

CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSB and CDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer