CRXP vs. INEQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CRXP (Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF) and INEQ (Columbia International Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRXP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Columbia, while INEQ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Columbia. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CRXP charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for INEQ.

Performance

CRXP vs. INEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRXP achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than INEQ's 12.10% return.

CRXP

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: -0.61%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

INEQ

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 4.84%
• 6M: 7.09%
• YTD: 12.10%
• 1Y: 28.80%
• 3Y*: 20.29%
• 5Y*: 13.46%
• 10Y*: 9.92%
• ALL TIME*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF	$4.49K	$319.92K	$113.61K
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	$606.92K	$766.57K	$703.44K

CRXP vs. INEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF	-0.10%	-0.22%
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	12.10%	2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CRXP and INEQ is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

CRXP vs. INEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRXP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INEQ

INEQ Risk / Return Rank: 84
INEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
INEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
INEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 86
INEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
INEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRXP vs. INEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) and Columbia International Equity Income ETF (INEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRXP	INEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.00	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.69	—

Drawdowns

CRXP vs. INEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRXP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum INEQ drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRXP and INEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRXP	INEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-41.71%	+38.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.51%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.22%	-0.61%	-1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-7.00%	+5.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRXP	INEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76%	13.57%	-9.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	15.33%	-11.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.76%	16.37%	-12.61%

CRXP vs. INEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRXP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than INEQ's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRXP vs. INEQ - Dividend Comparison

CRXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than INEQ's 9.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF	2.53%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INEQ Columbia International Equity Income ETF	9.31%	9.76%	3.11%	3.27%	3.57%	3.43%	2.64%	3.34%	7.25%	4.63%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRXP and INEQ in my portfolio?

CRXP and INEQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRXP or INEQ?

On fees, CRXP is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRXP or INEQ?

CRXP is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for INEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRXP or INEQ?

INEQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.31%, compared with 2.53% for CRXP.

What is the main difference between CRXP and INEQ?

CRXP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while INEQ is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for CRXP and 0.45% for INEQ.