CRWV vs. STIP
CRWV (CoreWeave, Inc.) is a stock, while STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Over the past year, CRWV returned -41.56% vs 3.65% for STIP. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CRWV vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 40.87% return, which is significantly higher than STIP's 1.39% return.
CRWV
- 1D
- -4.58%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 40.87%
- 6M
- 27.91%
- 1Y
- -41.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STIP
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 3.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 3.08%
CRWV vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 40.87% | 83.62% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.39% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWV and STIP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWV vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank
CRWV
STIP
CRWV vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWV | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.50 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 5.05 | -5.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 18.15 | -19.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWV vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and STIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWV | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.84% | -5.50% | -59.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.93% | -0.73% | -60.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.05% | -0.67% | -44.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.27% | -0.99% | -36.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.40% | 0.20% | +41.20% |
Volatility
CRWV vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a higher volatility of 24.70% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.65%. This indicates that CRWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWV | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.70% | 0.65% | +24.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.50% | 1.14% | +63.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.27% | 1.53% | +92.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.33% | 2.74% | +110.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.33% | 2.45% | +110.88% |
Dividends
CRWV vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
CRWV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.33% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWV and STIP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWV has higher volatility (24.70%) compared to STIP (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWV dropped -64.84% vs STIP's -5.50%.
STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWV and STIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer