CRWU vs. MSFX
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSFX.
Performance
CRWU vs. MSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly higher than MSFX's -27.97% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- -33.95%
- YTD
- 48.91%
- 6M
- -4.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.01%
- YTD
- -27.97%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -29.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWU vs. MSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 48.91% | -76.87% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -27.97% | -18.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and MSFX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. MSFX — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
MSFX
CRWU vs. MSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWU | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | -0.16 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. MSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than MSFX's maximum drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and MSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.37% | -60.86% | -28.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -60.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.77% | -45.47% | -32.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.57% | -21.28% | -44.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 31.93% | — |
Volatility
CRWU vs. MSFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.93% | 50.39% | +141.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 49.29% | +142.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 49.29% | +142.64% |
CRWU vs. MSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. MSFX - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than MSFX's 7.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 5.71% | 8.51% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 7.42% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and MSFX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSFX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 7.42%, compared with 5.71% for CRWU.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 1.05% for MSFX.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and MSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer