CRWG vs. DIG
CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRWG is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.
Performance
CRWG vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 46.05% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 66.82% return.
CRWG
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- -34.22%
- YTD
- 46.05%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 66.82%
- 6M
- 58.48%
- 1Y
- 98.04%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 28.36%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
CRWG vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 46.05% | -83.24% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 66.82% | 12.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWG and DIG is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWG vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
CRWG
DIG
CRWG vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWG | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | -0.00 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
CRWG vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and DIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWG | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.42% | -97.04% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.18% | -51.13% | -27.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.58% | -64.36% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.52% | — |
Volatility
CRWG vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWG | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.34% | 40.83% | +150.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.34% | 51.59% | +139.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.34% | 57.80% | +133.54% |
CRWG vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWG vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than DIG's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 5.06% | 7.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.49% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWG and DIG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.
CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 1.49% for DIG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 0.95% for DIG.
Find the right allocation for CRWG and DIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer