CRWG vs. BBRE
CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and BBRE (JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRWG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BBRE is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index. CRWG is actively managed, while BBRE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BBRE.
Performance
CRWG vs. BBRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a -10.07% return, which is significantly lower than BBRE's 17.84% return.
CRWG
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -27.60%
- 6M
- -27.47%
- YTD
- -10.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBRE
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 1Y
- 19.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
CRWG vs. BBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | -10.07% | -81.81% |
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 17.84% | 3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWG and BBRE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWG vs. BBRE — Risk / Return Rank
CRWG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBRE
CRWG vs. BBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWG | BBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWG vs. BBRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, which is greater than BBRE's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and BBRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWG | BBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.42% | -43.61% | -45.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.57% | -1.40% | -85.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.72% | -10.40% | -59.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility
CRWG vs. BBRE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWG | BBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 188.63% | 14.06% | +174.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 188.63% | 18.83% | +169.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 188.63% | 22.51% | +166.12% |
CRWG vs. BBRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BBRE's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWG vs. BBRE - Dividend Comparison
CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.22%, more than BBRE's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 2.63% | 3.24% | 3.19% | 3.68% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 3.17% | 2.19% | 1.96% |
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 8.22% | 7.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWG and BBRE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CRWG.
CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 8.22%, compared with 2.63% for BBRE.
CRWG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BBRE is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 0.11% for BBRE.
Find the right allocation for CRWG and BBRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer