CRWD vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 29.29%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for GCOW. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRWD vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 59.49% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 12.18% return.

CRWD

• 1D: -2.78%
• 1M: 59.32%
• YTD: 59.49%
• 6M: 42.63%
• 1Y: 52.96%
• 3Y*: 70.32%
• 5Y*: 29.29%
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWD vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	59.49%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	324.74%	-14.02%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.18%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.49%	14.58%	-4.33%	8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWD and GCOW is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019	0.16

The correlation between CRWD and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CRWD vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 70
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 67

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 79
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWD vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRWD	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	2.52	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	3.63	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.44	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	5.71	-4.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.29	15.05	-11.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRWD vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWD Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWD and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRWD	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	2.52	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.92	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.59	+0.21

Drawdowns

CRWD vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWD	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.69%	-37.64%	-30.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.18%	-4.77%	-32.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.44%	-12.35%	-32.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.69%	-21.48%	-46.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.42%	-2.73%	-1.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.66%	-5.84%	-17.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.14%	1.81%	+14.33%

Volatility

CRWD vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.85%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRWD	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.34%	2.85%	+12.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.18%	7.99%	+28.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.66%	10.81%	+33.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.73%	13.49%	+37.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.95%	16.20%	+39.75%

Dividends

CRWD vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.43%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWD and GCOW in my portfolio?

CRWD and GCOW have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRWD or GCOW?

CRWD has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.