PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWD vs. CCJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRWD vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 45.66% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 10.35% return.


CRWD

1D
-1.26%
1M
21.37%
YTD
45.66%
6M
35.27%
1Y
41.74%
3Y*
64.60%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*

CCJ

1D
2.01%
1M
-12.51%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.35%
1Y
52.94%
3Y*
47.60%
5Y*
36.72%
10Y*
25.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWD vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
45.66%37.00%34.01%142.49%-48.58%-3.34%324.74%-21.46%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
10.35%78.38%19.47%90.49%4.35%63.19%51.47%-12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWD and CCJ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019

0.28

The correlation between CRWD and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRWD:

$176.08B

CCJ:

$43.98B

EPS

CRWD:

-$0.02

CCJ:

CA$1.49

PS Ratio

CRWD:

34.09

CCJ:

17.37

PB Ratio

CRWD:

38.00

CCJ:

8.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRWD:

$5.09B

CCJ:

CA$3.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRWD:

$3.82B

CCJ:

CA$1.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRWD:

$246.78M

CCJ:

CA$996.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWD vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD
CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWD vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRWDCCJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.83

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

4.43

-1.86

CRWD vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWD and CCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRWD vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and CCJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWDCCJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-87.53%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.18%

-29.13%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.44%

-40.01%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.69%

-40.01%

-27.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.70%

-24.71%

+12.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-46.07%

+22.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.29%

11.99%

+4.30%

Volatility

CRWD vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ) have volatilities of 18.47% and 17.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWDCCJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.47%

17.90%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.66%

39.91%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.48%

55.17%

-9.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.78%

50.01%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.07%

46.75%

+9.32%

Dividends

CRWD vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.17%0.19%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%4.33%3.82%3.24%
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CRWD vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.39B
847.55M
(CRWD) Total Revenue
(CCJ) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CRWD values in USD, CCJ values in CAD

CRWD vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
75.3%
34.3%
Portfolio components
CRWD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.

CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.

CRWD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

CRWD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWD and CCJ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRWD has higher volatility (18.47%) compared to CCJ (17.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs CCJ's -87.53%.

CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWD and CCJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer