CRUX vs. JBND
CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and JBND (Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JBND.
Performance
CRUX vs. JBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRUX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JBND
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX vs. JBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.12% |
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRUX and JBND is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRUX vs. JBND — Risk / Return Rank
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JBND
CRUX vs. JBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRUX | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRUX vs. JBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum JBND drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and JBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRUX | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -4.48% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.62% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -1.16% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.02% | — |
Volatility
CRUX vs. JBND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRUX | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 3.78% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 4.83% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 4.83% | -0.71% |
CRUX vs. JBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than JBND's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRUX vs. JBND - Dividend Comparison
CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than JBND's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.58% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, CRUX and JBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for CRUX.
JBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.30% for JBND.
Find the right allocation for CRUX and JBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer