CRUX vs. IBTM
CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and IBTM (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. CRUX is actively managed, while IBTM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTM.
Performance
CRUX vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRUX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTM
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 2.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | -0.08% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | -0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRUX and IBTM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRUX vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank
CRUX
IBTM
CRUX vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRUX | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.20 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
CRUX vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and IBTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRUX | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -13.60% | +11.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -2.25% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -4.82% | +4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility
CRUX vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRUX | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28% | 4.09% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 7.55% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 7.55% | -3.27% |
CRUX vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRUX vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison
CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than IBTM's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | 3.95% | 3.87% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, CRUX and IBTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IBTM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for CRUX.
IBTM has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.07% for IBTM.
Find the right allocation for CRUX and IBTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer