CRUX vs. FCBD
CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and FCBD (Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FCBD.
Performance
CRUX vs. FCBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRUX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCBD
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX vs. FCBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.12% |
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRUX and FCBD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRUX vs. FCBD — Risk / Return Rank
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCBD
CRUX vs. FCBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRUX | FCBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRUX vs. FCBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, which is greater than FCBD's maximum drawdown of -1.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and FCBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRUX | FCBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -1.64% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.80% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.37% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility
CRUX vs. FCBD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRUX | FCBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 2.34% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 2.60% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 2.60% | +1.52% |
CRUX vs. FCBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FCBD's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRUX vs. FCBD - Dividend Comparison
CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than FCBD's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF | 4.22% | 4.34% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRUX and FCBD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FCBD.
FCBD has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.90% for FCBD.
Find the right allocation for CRUX and FCBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer