FCBD vs. EDGF

Last updated Apr 17, 2026

FCBD (Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF) and EDGF (3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCBD returned 4.98% vs 3.69% for EDGF. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCBD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for EDGF.

Performance

FCBD vs. EDGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than EDGF's 0.74% return.

FCBD

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 4.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EDGF

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 3.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBD vs. EDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF	0.44%	6.29%	0.04%
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	0.74%	4.36%	0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBD and EDGF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	0.71

The correlation between FCBD and EDGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 — a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCBD vs. EDGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBD

FCBD Risk / Return Rank: 56
FCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 57

EDGF

EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 50
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 41
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBD vs. EDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCBD	EDGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.74	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	2.64	+0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.34	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	3.98	-0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.13	12.19	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCBD vs. EDGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBD Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the EDGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBD and EDGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCBD	EDGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	1.74	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.02	0.98	+1.03

Drawdowns

FCBD vs. EDGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBD drawdown since its inception was -1.63%, roughly equal to the maximum EDGF drawdown of -1.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBD and EDGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCBD	EDGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-1.62%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.63%	-0.92%	-0.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.23%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.29%	-0.48%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.30%	+0.14%

Volatility

FCBD vs. EDGF - Volatility Comparison

Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) at 0.24%. This indicates that FCBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCBD	EDGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	0.24%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.57%	1.45%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36%	2.15%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.58%	2.44%	+0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.58%	2.44%	+0.14%

FCBD vs. EDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EDGF's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCBD vs. EDGF - Dividend Comparison

FCBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than EDGF's 3.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF	4.22%	4.34%	0.08%
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	3.45%	3.61%	0.49%