CRUX vs. DMBS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and DMBS (Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DMBS.

Performance

CRUX vs. DMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRUX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DMBS

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.86%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.75%
• 1Y: 6.19%
• 3Y*: 4.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRUX vs. DMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	0.12%
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF	0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CRUX and DMBS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026	0.93

Return for Risk

CRUX vs. DMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRUX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DMBS

DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 43
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 43
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRUX vs. DMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRUX	DMBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.50	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.94	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.45	—

Drawdowns

CRUX vs. DMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum DMBS drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and DMBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRUX	DMBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-8.14%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-1.47%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-1.70%	+1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRUX	DMBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.12%	4.15%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.12%	6.25%	-2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.12%	6.25%	-2.13%

CRUX vs. DMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than DMBS's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRUX vs. DMBS - Dividend Comparison

CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than DMBS's 5.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF	5.11%	4.96%	4.97%	2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRUX and DMBS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CRUX and DMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CRUX or DMBS?

On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRUX or DMBS?

CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRUX or DMBS?

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.

What is the main difference between CRUX and DMBS?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.49% for DMBS.