PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMBS vs. IBTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMBS vs. IBTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMBS achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than IBTO's -1.17% return.


DMBS

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.36%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.38%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.41%

IBTO

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
-1.17%
1Y
0.84%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.27M$2.67M$3.33M
$4.47M$2.89M$2.06M

DMBS vs. IBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
-0.38%8.54%2.09%2.01%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
-1.17%8.23%-0.87%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DMBS and IBTO is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.93

The correlation between DMBS and IBTO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMBS vs. IBTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTO
IBTO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IBTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DMBS vs. IBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMBSIBTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.55

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

1.25

+2.40

DMBS vs. IBTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the IBTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMBS and IBTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMBS vs. IBTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMBS drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, roughly equal to the maximum IBTO drawdown of -8.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMBS and IBTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMBSIBTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-8.36%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-3.66%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.19%

-6.91%

+0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-3.22%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-2.37%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

1.61%

-0.52%

Volatility

DMBS vs. IBTO - Volatility Comparison

Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) at 1.04%. This indicates that DMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMBSIBTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

1.04%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.37%

3.28%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

4.31%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

6.51%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

6.51%

-0.30%

DMBS vs. IBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTO's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMBS vs. IBTO - Dividend Comparison

DMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than IBTO's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
4.78%4.96%4.97%2.82%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
3.83%4.05%4.23%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DMBS and IBTO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to IBTO (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMBS dropped -8.14% vs IBTO's -8.36%.

On 3-year performance, DMBS leads with 4.54% vs 2.95% for IBTO. On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTO has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 4.54% return vs 2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.83% for IBTO.

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DMBS and 0.07% for IBTO.

DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMBS and IBTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer