CRTC vs. KQQQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) and KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CRTC is passively managed, while KQQQ is actively managed. Over the past year, CRTC returned 24.34% vs 42.48% for KQQQ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRTC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for KQQQ.

Performance

CRTC vs. KQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTC achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than KQQQ's 18.81% return.

CRTC

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 5.40%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: 24.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KQQQ

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 7.64%
• YTD: 18.81%
• 6M: 16.44%
• 1Y: 42.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRTC vs. KQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	9.32%	18.69%	3.28%
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	18.81%	16.64%	11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CRTC and KQQQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024	0.82

The correlation between CRTC and KQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRTC vs. KQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRTC	KQQQ
Technology	33.5%	49.9%
Communication Services	16.0%	29.0%
Healthcare	14.1%	1.4%
Industrials	14.1%	2.5%
Energy	7.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	17.2%
Utilities	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	1.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

CRTC vs. KQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 56
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

KQQQ

KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 62
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTC vs. KQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRTC	KQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.35	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	3.11	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.47	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.11	8.16	+1.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRTC vs. KQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the KQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTC and KQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRTC	KQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.35	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	1.13	+0.25

Drawdowns

CRTC vs. KQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTC drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum KQQQ drawdown of -26.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTC and KQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRTC	KQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-26.15%	+7.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-17.30%	+8.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-1.34%	+0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-4.70%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	5.22%	-2.81%

Volatility

CRTC vs. KQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) is 3.23%, while Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that CRTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRTC	KQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.23%	6.12%	-2.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.65%	14.32%	-4.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	18.16%	-5.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.72%	23.41%	-7.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.72%	23.41%	-7.69%

CRTC vs. KQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRTC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRTC vs. KQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than KQQQ's 13.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.99%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	13.77%	12.01%	2.48%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRTC and KQQQ in my portfolio?

CRTC and KQQQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRTC or KQQQ?

KQQQ has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to CRTC (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRTC dropped -19.07% vs KQQQ's -26.15%.

Which ETF is better, CRTC or KQQQ?

On 1-year performance, KQQQ leads with 42.48% vs 24.34% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRTC or KQQQ?

Over the 1-year period, KQQQ has performed better with a 42.48% return vs 24.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRTC or KQQQ?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRTC or KQQQ?

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 0.99% for CRTC.

What is the main difference between CRTC and KQQQ?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CRTC and 0.99% for KQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.