CRTC vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CRTC is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRTC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

CRTC vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRTC

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 23.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRTC vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.85%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CRTC and ARMH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

CRTC vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 55
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTC vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRTC	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.88	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRTC	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	471,500.14	-471,498.78

Drawdowns

CRTC vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTC drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTC and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRTC	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-1.61%	-17.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	0.00%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-0.40%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRTC	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	113.00%	-100.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	113.00%	-97.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	113.00%	-97.27%

CRTC vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRTC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRTC vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	1.00%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRTC and ARMH in my portfolio?

CRTC and ARMH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRTC or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRTC or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CRTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRTC or ARMH?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between CRTC and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CRTC and 0.19% for ARMH.