PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRT-UN.TO achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.99% return.


CRT-UN.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.71%
YTD
11.28%
6M
14.21%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
7.40%

ZMMK.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.17%
1Y
2.50%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
11.28%20.98%3.91%-0.26%-5.16%3.58%
ZMMK.TO
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series
0.99%2.77%4.94%4.86%1.99%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CRT-UN.TO and ZMMK.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRT-UN.TO
CRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ZMMK.TO
ZMMK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRT-UN.TOZMMK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-22.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

5.48

-4.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

83.57

-80.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

380.38

-373.17

CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 9.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRT-UN.TO and ZMMK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRT-UN.TOZMMK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

9.68

-8.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

10.31

-9.77

Drawdowns

CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.88%, which is greater than ZMMK.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT-UN.TO and ZMMK.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRT-UN.TOZMMK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.88%

-0.16%

-45.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-0.03%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-0.08%

-17.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

0.00%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-0.00%

-6.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

0.01%

+2.37%

Volatility

CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Volatility Comparison

CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that CRT-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMMK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRT-UN.TOZMMK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

0.06%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

0.18%

+9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

0.26%

+12.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

0.34%

+17.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.25%

0.34%

+19.91%

Dividends

CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Dividend Comparison

CRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than ZMMK.TO's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT-UN.TO
CT Real Estate Investment Trust
5.36%5.77%6.40%6.04%5.48%4.76%5.09%4.70%6.37%4.82%4.57%5.09%
ZMMK.TO
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series
2.53%3.02%4.66%4.98%1.95%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRT-UN.TO and ZMMK.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRT-UN.TO and ZMMK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer