CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO
CRT-UN.TO (CT Real Estate Investment Trust) is a stock, while ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) is Money Market fund actively managed by BMO. Over the past 3 years, CRT-UN.TO returned 12.19%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for ZMMK.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRT-UN.TO achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.99% return.
CRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 11.28% | 20.98% | 3.91% | -0.26% | -5.16% | 3.58% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 0.99% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRT-UN.TO and ZMMK.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CRT-UN.TO
ZMMK.TO
CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRT-UN.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -22.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 5.48 | -4.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 83.57 | -80.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 380.38 | -373.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRT-UN.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 9.68 | -8.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 10.31 | -9.77 |
Drawdowns
CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.88%, which is greater than ZMMK.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT-UN.TO and ZMMK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRT-UN.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.88% | -0.16% | -45.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -0.03% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -0.08% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | 0.00% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -0.00% | -6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 0.01% | +2.37% |
Volatility
CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Volatility Comparison
CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that CRT-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMMK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRT-UN.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 0.06% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 0.18% | +9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 0.26% | +12.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 0.34% | +17.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 0.34% | +19.91% |
Dividends
CRT-UN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Dividend Comparison
CRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than ZMMK.TO's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.36% | 5.77% | 6.40% | 6.04% | 5.48% | 4.76% | 5.09% | 4.70% | 6.37% | 4.82% | 4.57% | 5.09% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.53% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRT-UN.TO and ZMMK.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CRT-UN.TO and ZMMK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer