CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN.TO).
Performance
CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.54% | 20.98% | 3.91% | -0.26% | -5.16% | 16.13% | 2.73% | 47.58% | -15.83% | 1.42% |
REI-UN.TO RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.77% | 9.00% | 4.33% | -6.86% | -3.42% | 43.34% | -31.78% | 18.79% | 3.72% | -3.23% |
Fundamentals
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$2.85B
REI-UN.TO:
CA$5.80B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$1.52
REI-UN.TO:
CA$0.23
CRT-UN.TO:
11.26
REI-UN.TO:
83.83
CRT-UN.TO:
0.21
REI-UN.TO:
0.38
CRT-UN.TO:
6.54
REI-UN.TO:
3.99
CRT-UN.TO:
1.44
REI-UN.TO:
0.81
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$604.25M
REI-UN.TO:
CA$1.46B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$471.69M
REI-UN.TO:
CA$772.46M
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$612.14M
REI-UN.TO:
CA$535.98M
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CRT-UN.TO having a 6.54% return and REI-UN.TO slightly higher at 6.77%. Over the past 10 years, CRT-UN.TO has outperformed REI-UN.TO with an annualized return of 7.51%, while REI-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.67% annualized return.
CRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- 23.05%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
REI-UN.TO
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 6.66%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 2.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CRT-UN.TO
REI-UN.TO
CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRT-UN.TO | REI-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 1.43 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 2.04 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 3.28 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 8.59 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRT-UN.TO | REI-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.43 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.32 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.12 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -0.73 | +1.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRT-UN.TO and REI-UN.TO is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
CRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than REI-UN.TO's 5.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.52% | 5.77% | 6.40% | 6.04% | 5.48% | 4.76% | 5.09% | 4.70% | 6.37% | 4.82% | 4.57% | 5.09% |
REI-UN.TO RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.89% | 6.17% | 6.06% | 5.77% | 4.80% | 4.18% | 8.60% | 5.38% | 6.05% | 5.79% | 5.29% | 5.95% |
Drawdowns
CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.88%, smaller than the maximum REI-UN.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT-UN.TO and REI-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRT-UN.TO | REI-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.88% | -100.00% | +54.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -6.21% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.70% | -31.08% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.88% | -54.93% | +9.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -99.92% | +99.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -92.97% | +86.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.48% | -0.06% |
Volatility
CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) is 5.20%, while RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (REI-UN.TO) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that CRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REI-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRT-UN.TO | REI-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 5.58% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 10.56% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 14.90% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 18.26% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 21.96% | -1.66% |
Financials
CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CT Real Estate Investment Trust and RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRT-UN.TO vs. REI-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison
CRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CT Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 119.44M and revenue of 152.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.1%.
REI-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 204.35M and revenue of 358.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.0%.
CRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CT Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 115.18M and revenue of 152.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.3%.
REI-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 190.01M and revenue of 358.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.
CRT-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CT Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 88.39M and revenue of 152.92M, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
REI-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 128.17M and revenue of 358.68M, resulting in a net margin of 35.7%.