CRT-UN.TO vs. CRR-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust (CRR-UN.TO).
Performance
CRT-UN.TO vs. CRR-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRT-UN.TO vs. CRR-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.54% | 20.98% | 3.91% | -0.26% | -5.16% | 16.13% | 2.73% | 47.58% | -15.83% | 1.42% |
CRR-UN.TO Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust | 6.28% | 22.88% | 2.07% | -7.30% | -10.05% | 36.74% | -3.90% | -182.41% | -2.60% | 8.56% |
Fundamentals
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$2.85B
CRR-UN.TO:
CA$2.98B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$1.52
CRR-UN.TO:
CA$0.63
CRT-UN.TO:
11.26
CRR-UN.TO:
25.57
CRT-UN.TO:
0.21
CRR-UN.TO:
0.57
CRT-UN.TO:
6.54
CRR-UN.TO:
5.94
CRT-UN.TO:
1.44
CRR-UN.TO:
1.62
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$604.25M
CRR-UN.TO:
CA$500.07M
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$471.69M
CRR-UN.TO:
CA$328.15M
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$612.14M
CRR-UN.TO:
CA$311.51M
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CRT-UN.TO having a 6.54% return and CRR-UN.TO slightly lower at 6.28%.
CRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- 23.05%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
CRR-UN.TO
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 16.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRT-UN.TO vs. CRR-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CRT-UN.TO
CRR-UN.TO
CRT-UN.TO vs. CRR-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) and Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust (CRR-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRT-UN.TO | CRR-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 1.08 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 1.63 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 2.70 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 8.97 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRT-UN.TO | CRR-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.08 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.34 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between CRT-UN.TO and CRR-UN.TO is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CRT-UN.TO vs. CRR-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
CRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than CRR-UN.TO's 5.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.52% | 5.77% | 6.40% | 6.04% | 5.48% | 4.76% | 5.09% | 4.70% | 6.37% | 4.82% | 4.57% | 5.09% |
CRR-UN.TO Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.60% | 5.85% | 6.72% | 6.43% | 5.60% | 4.77% | 6.19% | 268.31% | 7.30% | 6.62% | 6.73% | 7.14% |
Drawdowns
CRT-UN.TO vs. CRR-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.88%, smaller than the maximum CRR-UN.TO drawdown of -144.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRT-UN.TO and CRR-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRT-UN.TO | CRR-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.88% | -144.01% | +98.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -6.77% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.70% | -31.10% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.88% | -190.06% | +144.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -136.02% | +135.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -68.99% | +62.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.13% | +0.29% |
Volatility
CRT-UN.TO vs. CRR-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust (CRR-UN.TO) at 4.70%. This indicates that CRT-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRR-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRT-UN.TO | CRR-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 4.70% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 9.93% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 15.82% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 18.58% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 54.57% | -34.27% |
Financials
CRT-UN.TO vs. CRR-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CT Real Estate Investment Trust and Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities