ZMMK.TO vs. HSAV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO).
ZMMK.TO and HSAV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZMMK.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Nov 28, 2021. HSAV.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Feb 5, 2020.
Performance
ZMMK.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZMMK.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 0.57% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 1.13% | 2.58% | 4.24% | 5.04% | 2.79% | 0.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than HSAV.TO's 1.13% return.
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 2.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSAV.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZMMK.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMMK.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than HSAV.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ZMMK.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZMMK.TO
HSAV.TO
ZMMK.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZMMK.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 10.17 | 2.28 | +7.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 25.94 | 3.43 | +22.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.05 | 1.44 | +4.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 86.98 | 5.23 | +81.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 406.21 | 14.33 | +391.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZMMK.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17 | 2.28 | +7.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.37 | 1.77 | +8.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMMK.TO and HSAV.TO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
ZMMK.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while HSAV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.68% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZMMK.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum HSAV.TO drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and HSAV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMMK.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -2.18% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -0.59% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.22% | -0.21% |
Volatility
ZMMK.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.08%, while Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) has a volatility of 0.49%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZMMK.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 0.49% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.20% | 0.96% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26% | 1.37% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 1.75% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 1.58% | -1.24% |