ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO).
ZMMK.TO and TCSH.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZMMK.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Nov 28, 2021. TCSH.TO is an actively managed fund by TD. It was launched on Feb 15, 2024.
Performance
ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 0.57% | 2.77% | 4.10% |
TCSH.TO TD Cash Management ETF | 0.37% | 3.09% | 4.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than TCSH.TO's 0.37% return.
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 2.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCSH.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 2.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMMK.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than TCSH.TO's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZMMK.TO
TCSH.TO
ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZMMK.TO | TCSH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 10.17 | 5.78 | +4.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 25.94 | 10.76 | +15.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.05 | 2.86 | +3.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 86.98 | 26.59 | +60.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 406.21 | 107.81 | +298.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZMMK.TO | TCSH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17 | 5.78 | +4.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 10.37 | 5.30 | +5.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMMK.TO and TCSH.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than TCSH.TO's 2.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.68% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% |
TCSH.TO TD Cash Management ETF | 2.74% | 3.03% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum TCSH.TO drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and TCSH.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMMK.TO | TCSH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.54% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -0.10% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.02% | -0.01% |
Volatility
ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.08%, while TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO) has a volatility of 0.13%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCSH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZMMK.TO | TCSH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 0.13% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.20% | 0.37% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26% | 0.46% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 0.71% | -0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.34% | 0.71% | -0.37% |