PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZMMK.TO
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series
0.57%2.77%4.10%
TCSH.TO
TD Cash Management ETF
0.37%3.09%4.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMMK.TO achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than TCSH.TO's 0.37% return.


ZMMK.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.57%
6M
1.20%
1Y
2.62%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
10Y*

TCSH.TO

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.37%
6M
1.22%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMMK.TO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than TCSH.TO's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMMK.TO
ZMMK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMMK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TCSH.TO
TCSH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TCSH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCSH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) and TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZMMK.TOTCSH.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.17

5.78

+4.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

25.94

10.76

+15.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

6.05

2.86

+3.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

86.98

26.59

+60.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

406.21

107.81

+298.41

ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 10.17, which is higher than the TCSH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMMK.TO and TCSH.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZMMK.TOTCSH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17

5.78

+4.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.37

5.30

+5.08

Correlation

The correlation between ZMMK.TO and TCSH.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZMMK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than TCSH.TO's 2.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
ZMMK.TO
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series
2.68%3.02%4.66%4.98%1.95%0.04%
TCSH.TO
TD Cash Management ETF
2.74%3.03%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMMK.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum TCSH.TO drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMMK.TO and TCSH.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMMK.TOTCSH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.54%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-0.10%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.01%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.02%

-0.01%

Volatility

ZMMK.TO vs. TCSH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) is 0.08%, while TD Cash Management ETF (TCSH.TO) has a volatility of 0.13%. This indicates that ZMMK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCSH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZMMK.TOTCSH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

0.13%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.20%

0.37%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26%

0.46%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.34%

0.71%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.34%

0.71%

-0.37%