CRSH vs. YMAG
CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -7.97% vs 16.42% for YMAG. Their -0.71 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.
Performance
CRSH vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly higher than YMAG's 3.10% return.
CRSH
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 13.05%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 21.72%
- 1Y
- -7.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.35%
YMAG
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- 16.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $457.04K | $338.01K | $365.84K | |
| $11.84M | $12.80M | $15.29M |
CRSH vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 21.72% | -13.40% | -52.42% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 3.10% | 18.64% | 27.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSH and YMAG is -0.69, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | -0.71 |
The correlation between CRSH and YMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.71 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSH vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank
CRSH
YMAG
CRSH vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRSH | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.16 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 1.15 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 3.27 | -3.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRSH vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and YMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSH | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -25.96% | -37.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.50% | -14.38% | -16.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.11% | -3.37% | -48.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.01% | -4.68% | -39.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.37% | 5.04% | +14.33% |
Volatility
CRSH vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 12.40% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 7.51%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSH | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | 7.51% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.58% | 14.72% | +11.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.86% | 18.38% | +18.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.45% | 21.20% | +26.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.45% | 21.20% | +26.25% |
CRSH vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRSH vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison
CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.07%, more than YMAG's 50.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 78.07% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 50.10% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRSH and YMAG have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSH has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to YMAG (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs YMAG's -25.96%.
On 1-year performance, YMAG leads with 16.42% vs -7.97% for CRSH. On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 7.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YMAG has performed better with a 16.42% return vs -7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 78.07%, compared with 50.10% for YMAG.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 1.28% for YMAG.
YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRSH and YMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer