CRSH vs. YMAG
CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while YMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -18.24% vs 27.02% for YMAG. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.
Performance
CRSH vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's 3.80% return.
CRSH
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- -18.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAG
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.14% | -13.40% | -51.96% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 3.80% | 18.64% | 25.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSH and YMAG is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024 | -0.70 |
The correlation between CRSH and YMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.70 to -0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSH vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank
CRSH
YMAG
CRSH vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRSH | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.29 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.89 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 6.63 | -7.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRSH | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 1.68 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | 1.19 | -1.90 |
Drawdowns
CRSH vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and YMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSH | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -25.96% | -37.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.45% | -14.38% | -19.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.42% | -2.71% | -56.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.11% | -4.52% | -38.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.14% | 4.08% | +17.06% |
Volatility
CRSH vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 3.67%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSH | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | 3.67% | +6.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.66% | 11.52% | +11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.72% | 16.19% | +20.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 20.88% | +26.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 20.88% | +26.62% |
CRSH vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRSH vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison
CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.17%, more than YMAG's 52.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 96.17% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 52.16% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRSH and YMAG have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSH has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to YMAG (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs YMAG's -25.96%.
On 1-year performance, YMAG leads with 27.02% vs -18.24% for CRSH. On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YMAG has performed better with a 27.02% return vs -18.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 96.17%, compared with 52.16% for YMAG.
CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while YMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 1.28% for YMAG.
YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRSH and YMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer