CRSH vs. TSYY
CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -18.24% vs -12.29% for TSYY. At a correlation of -0.84, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
CRSH vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly higher than TSYY's -16.60% return.
CRSH
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- -18.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.14% | -13.40% | 4.28% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | -15.96% | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSH and TSYY is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | -0.84 |
The correlation between CRSH and TSYY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSH vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
CRSH
TSYY
CRSH vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRSH | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.45 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -0.85 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRSH | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | -0.39 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -0.59 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
CRSH vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSH | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -41.52% | -22.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.45% | -27.31% | -6.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.42% | -36.69% | -22.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.11% | -25.88% | -17.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.14% | 14.49% | +6.65% |
Volatility
CRSH vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 4.86%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSH | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | 4.86% | +5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.66% | 19.69% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.72% | 31.77% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 37.52% | +9.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 37.52% | +9.98% |
CRSH vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CRSH and TSYY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
CRSH vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.17%, less than TSYY's 282.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 96.17% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRSH and TSYY have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSH has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to TSYY (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs TSYY's -41.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSYY leads with -12.29% vs -18.24% for CRSH. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSYY has performed better with a -12.29% return vs -18.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRSH and TSYY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 96.17% for CRSH.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares.
TSYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRSH and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer