CRSH vs. TSLS
CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while TSLS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Tesla, Inc. (-100% Daily). CRSH is actively managed, while TSLS is passively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -7.97% vs -17.47% for TSLS. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSLS.
Performance
CRSH vs. TSLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly lower than TSLS's 26.49% return.
CRSH
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 13.05%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 21.72%
- 1Y
- -7.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.35%
TSLS
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 16.39%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- YTD
- 26.49%
- 1Y
- -17.47%
- 3Y*
- -29.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $457.04K | $338.01K | $365.84K | |
| $28.02M | $26.25M | $30.64M |
CRSH vs. TSLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 21.72% | -13.40% | -52.42% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 26.49% | -34.95% | -64.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSH and TSLS is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | 0.96 |
The correlation between CRSH and TSLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSH vs. TSLS — Risk / Return Rank
CRSH
TSLS
CRSH vs. TSLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRSH | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.97 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | -0.44 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | -0.62 | +0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRSH vs. TSLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum TSLS drawdown of -90.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and TSLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSH | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -90.73% | +27.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.50% | -40.10% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.11% | -87.25% | +35.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.01% | -64.48% | +20.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.37% | 28.16% | -8.79% |
Volatility
CRSH vs. TSLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is 12.40%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) has a volatility of 16.85%. This indicates that CRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSH | TSLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | 16.85% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.58% | 34.00% | -7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.86% | 46.80% | -9.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.45% | 58.95% | -11.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.45% | 58.95% | -11.50% |
CRSH vs. TSLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLS's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRSH vs. TSLS - Dividend Comparison
CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.07%, more than TSLS's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 78.07% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 2.48% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, CRSH and TSLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSLS has higher volatility (16.85%) compared to CRSH (12.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs TSLS's -90.73%.
On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -7.97% vs -17.47% for TSLS. On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 12.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -7.97% return vs -17.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 78.07%, compared with 2.48% for TSLS.
CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.95% for TSLS.
CRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRSH and TSLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer