PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRSH vs. TSLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRSH vs. TSLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly lower than TSLS's 26.49% return.


CRSH

1D
-1.60%
1M
13.05%
6M
14.20%
YTD
21.72%
1Y
-7.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.35%

TSLS

1D
-1.71%
1M
16.39%
6M
19.20%
YTD
26.49%
1Y
-17.47%
3Y*
-29.44%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$457.04K$338.01K$365.84K
$28.02M$26.25M$30.64M

CRSH vs. TSLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
21.72%-13.40%-52.42%
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF
26.49%-34.95%-64.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and TSLS is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024

0.96

The correlation between CRSH and TSLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRSH vs. TSLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLS
TSLS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TSLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRSH vs. TSLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRSHTSLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.97

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

-0.44

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

-0.62

+0.21

CRSH vs. TSLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the TSLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and TSLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. TSLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum TSLS drawdown of -90.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and TSLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRSHTSLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.68%

-90.73%

+27.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.50%

-40.10%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.11%

-87.25%

+35.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.01%

-64.48%

+20.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.37%

28.16%

-8.79%

Volatility

CRSH vs. TSLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is 12.40%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) has a volatility of 16.85%. This indicates that CRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRSHTSLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.40%

16.85%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.58%

34.00%

-7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.86%

46.80%

-9.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.45%

58.95%

-11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.45%

58.95%

-11.50%

CRSH vs. TSLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLS's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRSH vs. TSLS - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.07%, more than TSLS's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
78.07%138.78%94.25%0.00%0.00%
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF
2.48%4.30%7.62%4.52%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CRSH and TSLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSLS has higher volatility (16.85%) compared to CRSH (12.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs TSLS's -90.73%.

On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -7.97% vs -17.47% for TSLS. On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 12.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -7.97% return vs -17.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 78.07%, compared with 2.48% for TSLS.

CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.95% for TSLS.

CRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRSH and TSLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer