CRSH vs. ACYS
CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.42 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
CRSH vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRSH
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 13.05%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 21.72%
- 1Y
- -7.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.35%
ACYS
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.06M | $7.37M | $6.29M | |
| $457.04K | $338.01K | $365.84K |
CRSH vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 8.38% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSH and ACYS is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSH vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
CRSH
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRSH vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRSH | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRSH vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSH | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -0.78% | -62.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.11% | 0.00% | -52.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.01% | -0.16% | -43.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.37% | — | — |
Volatility
CRSH vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSH | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.86% | 3.79% | +33.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.45% | 3.79% | +43.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.45% | 3.79% | +43.66% |
CRSH vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRSH vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.07%, more than ACYS's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 78.07% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRSH and ACYS have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 78.07%, compared with 1.26% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for CRSH and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer