CRSH vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

CRSH vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRSH

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.86%
• 6M: 7.60%
• YTD: 8.10%
• 1Y: -16.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.90%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	-3.74%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and ACYS is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	-0.34

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 5
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRSH	ACYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.81	—	—

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-0.63%	-63.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.47%	-0.05%	-57.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.77%	-0.14%	-43.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.12%	3.44%	+32.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.36%	3.44%	+43.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.36%	3.44%	+43.92%

CRSH vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSH vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.25%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	81.25%	138.78%	94.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and ACYS in my portfolio?

CRSH and ACYS have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or ACYS?

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or ACYS?

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or ACYS?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 81.25%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between CRSH and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.75% for ACYS.