PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRS vs. EDIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRS vs. EDIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 58.69% return, which is significantly higher than EDIT's 29.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CRS has outperformed EDIT with an annualized return of 33.20%, while EDIT has yielded a comparatively lower -21.70% annualized return.


CRS

1D
3.20%
1M
16.65%
YTD
58.69%
6M
62.07%
1Y
101.19%
3Y*
115.41%
5Y*
63.76%
10Y*
33.20%

EDIT

1D
-2.40%
1M
-14.95%
YTD
29.02%
6M
9.30%
1Y
38.48%
3Y*
-35.09%
5Y*
-40.81%
10Y*
-21.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRS vs. EDIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
58.69%86.23%141.72%94.48%29.50%2.66%-39.44%42.12%-29.16%43.40%
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
29.02%61.42%-87.46%14.21%-66.59%-62.13%136.78%30.15%-25.97%89.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CRS and EDIT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.28

The correlation between CRS and EDIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRS:

$25.10B

EDIT:

$258.89M

EPS

CRS:

$9.51

EDIT:

-$1.21

PS Ratio

CRS:

8.30

EDIT:

6.66

PB Ratio

CRS:

12.14

EDIT:

58.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRS:

$3.03B

EDIT:

$35.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRS:

$900.50M

EDIT:

$35.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRS:

$745.50M

EDIT:

-$76.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRS vs. EDIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRS
CRS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIT
EDIT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EDIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRS vs. EDIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRSEDITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.15

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.33

0.65

+4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.55

1.15

+11.40

CRS vs. EDIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRS Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the EDIT Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRS and EDIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRSEDITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

0.41

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.38

-0.44

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

-0.26

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

-0.20

+0.55

Drawdowns

CRS vs. EDIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum EDIT drawdown of -98.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and EDIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRSEDITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.68%

-98.92%

+14.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.08%

-59.88%

+40.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.74%

-91.46%

+62.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.86%

-98.66%

+56.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.70%

-98.92%

+24.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-97.08%

+97.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.25%

-62.60%

+35.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.09%

33.66%

-25.57%

Volatility

CRS vs. EDIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) is 11.63%, while Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) has a volatility of 31.99%. This indicates that CRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRSEDITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.63%

31.99%

-20.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.18%

61.53%

-28.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.75%

95.12%

-47.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.58%

94.12%

-47.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.83%

83.83%

-35.00%

Dividends

CRS vs. EDIT - Dividend Comparison

CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while EDIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
0.16%0.25%0.47%1.13%2.17%2.74%2.75%1.61%2.13%1.41%1.99%2.38%
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CRS vs. EDIT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carpenter Technology Corporation and Editas Medicine, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
811.50M
0
(CRS) Total Revenue
(EDIT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CRS and EDIT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIT has higher volatility (31.99%) compared to CRS (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRS dropped -84.68% vs EDIT's -98.92%.

CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRS and EDIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer