CRS vs. CM
CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) and CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) are both stocks. CRS operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while CM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CRS returned 34.84%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for CM. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRS vs. CM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 86.47% return, which is significantly higher than CM's 24.28% return. Over the past 10 years, CRS has outperformed CM with an annualized return of 34.84%, while CM has yielded a comparatively lower 17.15% annualized return.
CRS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 35.09%
- YTD
- 86.47%
- 6M
- 79.45%
- 1Y
- 131.77%
- 3Y*
- 125.83%
- 5Y*
- 72.99%
- 10Y*
- 34.84%
CM
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- 24.28%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 67.98%
- 3Y*
- 43.12%
- 5Y*
- 20.06%
- 10Y*
- 17.15%
CRS vs. CM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 86.47% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 24.28% | 49.02% | 37.83% | 27.23% | -25.71% | 42.29% | 9.25% | 19.22% | -19.75% | 26.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRS and CM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 1997 | 0.39 |
The correlation between CRS and CM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRS:
$29.50B
CM:
$75.95B
CRS:
$9.51
CM:
CA$12.14
CRS:
61.70
CM:
13.01
CRS:
0.05
CM:
1.61
CRS:
9.76
CM:
2.07
CRS:
14.27
CM:
1.84
CRS:
$3.03B
CM:
CA$61.84B
CRS:
$900.50M
CM:
CA$28.74B
CRS:
$745.50M
CM:
CA$13.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRS vs. CM — Risk / Return Rank
CRS
CM
CRS vs. CM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRS | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.61 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.08 | 6.43 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.67 | 25.18 | -8.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRS vs. CM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than CM's maximum drawdown of -71.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and CM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRS | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -71.70% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.08% | -10.79% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -19.47% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.86% | -40.61% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.70% | -47.82% | -26.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.53% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.22% | -14.65% | -12.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 2.75% | +5.34% |
Volatility
CRS vs. CM - Volatility Comparison
Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 7.78%. This indicates that CRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRS | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 7.78% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.61% | 16.02% | +17.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.34% | 19.03% | +29.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.61% | 21.41% | +25.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.89% | 22.61% | +26.28% |
Dividends
CRS vs. CM - Dividend Comparison
CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than CM's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 2.65% | 3.17% | 4.21% | 5.88% | 7.77% | 4.08% | 5.06% | 6.47% | 5.48% | 5.28% | 5.93% | 6.71% |
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
Financials
CRS vs. CM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carpenter Technology Corporation and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRS vs. CM - Profitability Comparison
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 251.80M and revenue of 811.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
CM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 186.50M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
CM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 139.60M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
CM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRS and CM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRS has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to CM (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRS dropped -84.68% vs CM's -71.70%.
CM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRS and CM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer