PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRS vs. PGR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CRSPGR
YTD Return151.68%65.75%
1Y Return160.47%63.05%
3Y Return (Ann)76.20%41.20%
5Y Return (Ann)30.62%32.25%
10Y Return (Ann)15.32%28.80%
Sharpe Ratio3.863.15
Sortino Ratio4.244.15
Omega Ratio1.541.55
Calmar Ratio8.409.10
Martin Ratio23.6324.11
Ulcer Index7.07%2.68%
Daily Std Dev43.30%20.48%
Max Drawdown-84.68%-71.06%
Current Drawdown-1.18%0.00%

Fundamentals


CRSPGR
Market Cap$8.91B$153.68B
EPS$4.44$13.75
PE Ratio39.8019.08
PEG Ratio1.591.05
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.83B$71.59B
Gross Profit (TTM)$642.50M$71.59B
EBITDA (TTM)$543.70M$10.17B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between CRS and PGR is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CRS vs. PGR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 151.68% return, which is significantly higher than PGR's 65.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CRS has underperformed PGR with an annualized return of 15.32%, while PGR has yielded a comparatively higher 28.80% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
67.33%
22.88%
CRS
PGR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRS vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRS, currently valued at 3.86, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRS, currently valued at 4.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRS, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRS, currently valued at 8.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRS, currently valued at 23.63, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0023.63
PGR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PGR, currently valued at 3.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PGR, currently valued at 4.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PGR, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PGR, currently valued at 9.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.009.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PGR, currently valued at 24.11, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0024.11

CRS vs. PGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRS Sharpe Ratio is 3.86, which is comparable to the PGR Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRS and PGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.86
3.15
CRS
PGR

Dividends

CRS vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison

CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than PGR's 0.44% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
0.45%1.13%2.17%2.74%2.75%1.61%2.13%1.41%1.99%2.38%1.46%1.16%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
0.44%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%5.53%1.05%

Drawdowns

CRS vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than PGR's maximum drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and PGR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.18%
0
CRS
PGR

Volatility

CRS vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a higher volatility of 15.91% compared to The Progressive Corporation (PGR) at 6.68%. This indicates that CRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.91%
6.68%
CRS
PGR

Financials

CRS vs. PGR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carpenter Technology Corporation and The Progressive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items