CRQSX vs. FZALX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CRQSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund) and FZALX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, CRQSX returned 22.35%/yr vs 25.92%/yr for FZALX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRQSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FZALX.

Performance

CRQSX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRQSX achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than FZALX's 10.51% return.

CRQSX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 11.49%
• 6M: 10.87%
• 1Y: 27.66%
• 3Y*: 22.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FZALX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 31.59%
• 3Y*: 25.92%
• 5Y*: 16.29%
• 10Y*: 16.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRQSX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund	11.49%	16.83%	24.70%	27.55%	-11.69%
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	10.51%	27.07%	26.13%	26.63%	-6.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CRQSX and FZALX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022	0.95

The correlation between CRQSX and FZALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRQSX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRQSX

CRQSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
CRQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CRQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CRQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CRQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CRQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

FZALX

FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRQSX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRQSX	FZALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.61	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	3.59	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.47	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	3.49	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.36	15.84	-1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRQSX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRQSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRQSX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRQSX	FZALX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.61	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.86	-0.02

Drawdowns

CRQSX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRQSX drawdown since its inception was -22.96%, smaller than the maximum FZALX drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRQSX and FZALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRQSX	FZALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.96%	-35.23%	+12.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.71%	-8.99%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.95%	-18.49%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.35%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.26%	-3.77%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.98%	-0.09%

Volatility

CRQSX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRQSX	FZALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	2.95%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.04%	9.12%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.93%	12.05%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.83%	16.71%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.83%	18.14%	-0.31%

CRQSX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRQSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRQSX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

CRQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than FZALX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund	3.31%	3.66%	2.09%	1.34%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	3.65%	4.04%	2.83%	2.17%	4.51%	4.92%	8.14%	13.19%	21.94%	16.56%	2.12%	4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRQSX and FZALX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CRQSX and FZALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CRQSX or FZALX?

FZALX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to CRQSX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRQSX dropped -22.96% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.