PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRPT vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRPT vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRPT achieves a -12.33% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 15.78% return.


CRPT

1D
0.23%
1M
-16.12%
YTD
-12.33%
6M
-24.87%
1Y
-34.00%
3Y*
39.51%
5Y*
10Y*

BLOK

1D
-0.36%
1M
4.79%
YTD
15.78%
6M
5.09%
1Y
29.55%
3Y*
52.79%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRPT vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CRPT
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF
-12.33%-9.54%75.29%193.86%-80.84%-8.07%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
15.78%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CRPT and BLOK is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.93

The correlation between CRPT and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRPT vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CRPT
BLOK

Financial Services

75.0%
55.3%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
6.7%

Technology

10.0%
31.8%

Communication Services

5.0%
5.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

CRPT
75.0%
BLOK
55.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CRPT
19.0%
BLOK
6.7%

Technology

CRPT
10.0%
BLOK
31.8%

Communication Services

CRPT
5.0%
BLOK
5.2%

Basic Materials

CRPT

-

BLOK

-

Consumer Defensive

CRPT

-

BLOK

-

Energy

CRPT

-

BLOK

-

Healthcare

CRPT

-

BLOK

-

Industrials

CRPT

-

BLOK
1.0%

Real Estate

CRPT

-

BLOK
0.0%

Utilities

CRPT

-

BLOK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRPT vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRPT
CRPT Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRPT vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRPTBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.15

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

0.83

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

1.82

-2.88

CRPT vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRPT and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRPTBLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

0.78

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.48

-0.58

Drawdowns

CRPT vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRPT drawdown since its inception was -88.34%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPT and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRPTBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.34%

-73.33%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.46%

-35.64%

-20.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.46%

-35.64%

-20.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.12%

-10.48%

-38.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.64%

-26.07%

-26.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.26%

16.24%

+16.02%

Volatility

CRPT vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) has a higher volatility of 13.14% compared to Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) at 10.39%. This indicates that CRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRPTBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.14%

10.39%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.70%

28.54%

+17.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.39%

38.13%

+19.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.72%

42.36%

+30.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.72%

38.96%

+33.76%

CRPT vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRPT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRPT vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

CRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%
CRPT
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF
0.86%0.75%1.84%0.00%0.03%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRPT and BLOK have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRPT has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to BLOK (10.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRPT dropped -88.34% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

On 3-year performance, BLOK leads with 52.79% vs 39.51% for CRPT. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.71% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 10.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 52.79% return vs 39.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CRPT.

CRPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CRPT and 0.71% for BLOK.

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRPT and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer